Are electronic signatures legal in Canada?
The short answer
Yes, in most cases. Each province and territory has an act on electronic documents, and most of them say that an electronic signature meets a legal requirement for a signature; the federal electronic documents act (PIPEDA) does the same for the federal laws it lists. Some documents are left out, such as wills and powers of attorney for a person’s finances or personal care, and the list differs by province.
The basic rule
Canada has no single e-signature law. Each province and territory has its own act, federal law covers requirements in federal statutes, and Quebec has a framework of its own. Most of the provincial acts use much the same wording. Ontario’s act is a fair example of what they say:
- Electronic form alone does not make a document invalid: a document is “not invalid or unenforceable by reason only of being in electronic form” (s. 4).
- A legal requirement that a document be signed is satisfied by an electronic signature (s. 11).
- A requirement for writing is met by an electronic document that is accessible so it can be used for later reference (s. 5).
- An electronic signature is electronic information that a person creates or adopts in order to sign a document and that is in, attached to or associated with the document (s. 1).
- An offer or an acceptance can be expressed electronically, including by clicking an icon, unless the parties agree otherwise (s. 19).
The act in each province and territory
The British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador and Northwest Territories acts each say that an electronic signature satisfies a requirement for a signature.
| Province or territory | Act |
|---|---|
| Alberta | Electronic Transactions Act |
| British Columbia | Electronic Transactions Act |
| Manitoba | The Electronic Commerce and Information Act |
| New Brunswick | Electronic Transactions Act |
| Newfoundland and Labrador | Electronic Commerce Act |
| Northwest Territories | Electronic Transactions Act |
| Nova Scotia | Electronic Commerce Act |
| Nunavut | Electronic Commerce Act |
| Ontario | Electronic Commerce Act, 2000 |
| Prince Edward Island | Electronic Commerce Act |
| Quebec | Act to establish a legal framework for information technology |
| Saskatchewan | The Electronic Information and Documents Act, 2000 |
| Yukon | Electronic Commerce Act |
Manitoba is worded differently. Its rule that an electronic signature meets a signature requirement applies to the laws designated under its act (s. 13), and the act also says a contract is not denied legal effect merely because an electronic document was used to form it (s. 19).
Federal law
Part 2 of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) deals with electronic documents under federal law. Its purpose is to allow electronic alternatives where federal laws contemplate the use of paper (s. 32).
A signature that a federal law requires can be an electronic signature if that law, or the provision, is listed in Schedule 2 or 3 of PIPEDA and the regulations are followed (s. 43). Some federal requirements, such as an original document, call for a “secure electronic signature”: one made with a technology or process set out in regulations (ss. 31 and 42).
PIPEDA defines an electronic signature as one or more letters, characters, numbers or other symbols in digital form, incorporated in, attached to or associated with an electronic document (s. 31).
In matters under federal jurisdiction, including criminal cases, the Canada Evidence Act puts the burden of proving that an electronic document is what it claims to be on whoever relies on it, and the best evidence rule is met by proof of the integrity of the system that recorded or stored it (ss. 2, 31.1 and 31.2).
The usual conditions
The provincial acts attach a few conditions to electronic signatures, and the rules of evidence add one more: being able to show what happened.
- Consent to electronic means. No one can be made to use or accept electronic documents, but consent can be inferred from a person’s conduct (Ontario s. 3, British Columbia s. 4, Alberta s. 8). A public body’s consent has to be explicit (Ontario s. 14).
- Identifying the signer. For documents named in regulations, the signature must be reliable for identifying the person (Ontario s. 11(3), Alberta s. 16(2)).
- Linking the signature to the document. For those same documents, the association between the signature and the document must also be reliable (Ontario s. 11(3), Alberta s. 16(2)).
- Integrity. Where an original is required, there must be a reliable assurance that the document has stayed complete and unaltered since it was first made in its final form (Ontario s. 8, British Columbia s. 8).
- Proof. If a signature is challenged, the party relying on the record must show it is what it claims to be, and its integrity can be shown through the system that stored it (Ontario Evidence Act s. 34.1, Canada Evidence Act ss. 31.1 and 31.2).
A signature given to a public body may also have to meet that body’s own technical standards (Ontario s. 17).
Documents that are left out
Each act lists documents it does not cover, and the lists differ. Where an act does not apply, check the law that governs that kind of document. Some examples, from the acts themselves:
- Ontario: wills and codicils, trusts created by them, powers of attorney for an individual’s financial affairs or personal care, negotiable instruments, documents of title (apart from carriage of goods), and documents named in regulations (s. 31).
- British Columbia: wills, trusts created by wills, powers of attorney for financial affairs or personal care, documents that create or transfer interests in land and must be registered to be effective against third parties, and anything named in regulations (s. 2(4)). Parts of the act also do not apply to negotiable instruments or documents of title (s. 2(5)).
- Alberta: wills and codicils, trusts created by them, enduring powers of attorney, personal directives, records that create or transfer interests in land, guarantees under the Guarantees Acknowledgment Act, and negotiable instruments (s. 7).
- Saskatchewan: wills, health care directives, trusts created by wills, and powers of attorney for financial affairs or personal care (s. 4).
- Nova Scotia: wills and codicils, trusts created by wills, powers of attorney for financial affairs or personal care, and documents that create or transfer interests in land and must be registered (s. 3(3)). Negotiable instruments are left out of most of the act (s. 3(4)).
Land documents show how much the lists differ: the British Columbia, Alberta, Nova Scotia and Northwest Territories acts all leave out documents that create or transfer interests in land. Check your own province’s list, and its regulations, before you move a document to electronic signing. For real estate, see our guide to e-signatures for real estate deals.
Quebec
Quebec has its own regime. Its Act to establish a legal framework for information technology says the legal value of a document is neither increased nor diminished solely because of the medium chosen, and a document whose integrity is ensured has the same legal value on paper or in another medium (s. 5). A signature can be affixed by any process that meets the Civil Code’s definition of a signature (s. 39; Civil Code art. 2827). Our guide to e-signatures in Quebec covers the rest.
How Maple eSign fits
Maple eSign is a Canadian-owned e-signature service, operated by Scrawlr Development Inc. in Vancouver, British Columbia. It records what happens when a document is signed; it does not decide whether a document may be signed electronically. That depends on the law that governs the document.
- Signers read and sign in the browser, in English or French (Canada), with the consent wording in their language.
- A sender can set an access code that the signer enters before the document opens.
- Document events are recorded in an append-only, hash-chained audit trail.
- When everyone has signed, the document is sealed into a PDF with a Certificate of Completion and a recorded SHA-256 hash.
- Maple eSign is free to use. Accounts are set up on request for now.
Sources
Official texts only: each link opens the law itself or the regulator’s own page.
- Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, Part 2Federal rules for electronic documents and signatures, and the definitions (ss. 31, 32, 42, 43 and 48).
- Canada Evidence ActProving an electronic document in federal matters (ss. 2, 31.1 and 31.2).
- Electronic Commerce Act, 2000 (Ontario)Legal recognition, signatures, writing, consent, originals, public bodies, contracts and excluded documents (ss. 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 19 and 31).
- Evidence Act (Ontario)Authenticity and integrity of electronic records (s. 34.1).
- Electronic Transactions Act (British Columbia)Excluded documents, consent, originals and signatures (ss. 2, 4, 8 and 11).
- Electronic Transactions Act (Alberta)Excluded documents, consent and signatures (ss. 7, 8 and 16).
- The Electronic Information and Documents Act, 2000 (Saskatchewan)Excluded documents and signatures (ss. 4 and 14).
- The Electronic Commerce and Information Act (Manitoba)Signatures under designated laws and electronic contracts (ss. 13 and 19).
- Electronic Transactions Act (New Brunswick)Signatures (s. 11).
- Electronic Commerce Act (Nova Scotia)Excluded documents and signatures (ss. 3 and 11).
- Electronic Commerce Act (Prince Edward Island)Signatures (s. 9).
- Electronic Commerce Act (Newfoundland and Labrador)Signatures (s. 11).
- Electronic Transactions Act (Northwest Territories)Excluded documents and signatures (ss. 3 and 13).
- Table of Public Statutes, E (Yukon)The name and citation of Yukon’s Electronic Commerce Act (RSY 2002, c. 66).
- Electronic Commerce Act, consolidation (Nunavut)The name of Nunavut’s act.
- Act to establish a legal framework for information technology (Quebec)The legal value of technology-based documents, and signatures (ss. 5 and 39).
- Civil Code of QuébecThe definition of a signature (art. 2827).